Help Protect Canadian Shores from Big Oil

Fisherman Steve Johansen is petitioning the Canadian government and the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, Gail Shea to protect our oceans through better policies and strict legislation so that Canada does not suffer the kind of disaster currently unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico.

Right now, British Petroleum, the owner of the well that was responsible for the Gulf disaster, currently has three licenses to drill in the Beaufort Sea in Canada’s Arctic, and in conjunction with a number of other oil companies, is petitioning the Canadian federal government to loosen the environmental regulations controlling Arctic drilling.  Chevron, another oil company is  drilling a well off the coast of Newfoundland that will run even deeper than the offending rig in the Gulf of Mexico, and there have been a number of questions raised regarding its safety.  Also, the provincial government of British Columbia is pushing the federal government to lift a moratorium on drilling of their coast, and they are already part of plan to build a pipeline from the notorious tar sands in Alberta to the coast in order to load oil on tankers for transoceanic shipping.  If successful, either move on their own could threaten one of Canada's most pristine and delicate coastlines known worldwide for its rich biodiversity.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has repeatedly displayed his arrogance and his ignorance by stating that the kind of spill that is destroying the ecosystem and the industries of the Gulf of Mexico could never happen in Canada.  His government must be sent a message that Canadians and the citizens of the world are not as stupid as he would like to assume we are or like us to be.  They need to know that it is no longer acceptable for our governments to pander to the will of big business, and that is time protect our environment and the future of our children.  

Accidents such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico can happen anywhere, and they do happen for a variety of reasons, one of the largest being the drive for profit on behalf of companies like British Petroleum which forces the cutting of corners and the continuance of dangerous operating practices with the sole intent of increasing the profitability of their operations.  

If you doubt this, ask yourself why they want Canadians to loosen our protections in the Arctic?  It has nothing to do with us, the average citizen, no matter what the rhetoric and propaganda about passing the savings onto customers.  We will never see a penny in savings.  Every penny they make lines the pockets of their shareholders and executives.  Again, if you doubt it, just look at the dividends and bonuses they have been passing around in the midst of the crisis in the Gulf while doing nothing to assist the people whose lives have been devastated with their oil spill.

Help Steve Johansen protect our shores and our seas from disaster.  Sign his petition, and help save our oceans: Help protect Canada's oceans

Learn more about "Cause An Effect - World Ocean's Day " at the David Suzuki Foundation's  Cause An Effect - World Ocean's Day YouTube site

Related articles by Zemanta

• Gorrie: The Big Spill, coming to a coast near you (thestar.com)
• Gulf Of Mexico Disaster Concerns Canadians - Could It Happen In Canada's Arctic? (newswire.ca)
• Canada sending help to Gulf oil disaster (canada.com)
• Canada's Cullen Wants 'Pause' in Offshore Drilling (Update1) (businessweek.com)
• Oil spill clouds World Oceans Day (msnbc.msn.com)
• Gulf-style oil spill would be more devastating in Canada (thestar.com)
• Saving Our Oceans: 'The Cove' Filmmakers Weigh In (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
• Save the Oceans, Save Ourselves! Sylvia Earle's Top 3 Actions to Take on World Oceans Day (treehugger.com)
• Sarah Chasis: On World Oceans Day: Gulf oil disaster underscores need for a National Ocean Policy (huffingtonpost.com)
• Hurricanes could derail August oil leak deadline (cnn.com)

Gulf Spill - Time to Look at the Little Pictures

Think Progress has posted a series of pictures that provide some insight into the suffering of the Gulf wildlife since the BP spill, but as poignant as they are, they only offer a glimpse of this unprecedented environmental disaster and the chain of death and devastation that has been ignited in the Gulf that will effect the entire world in the end.  This disaster encompasses the entire chain of being from bacteria to humanity, and from algae to the atmosphere.  All of it the result of the greed of a few capitalists seeking to advance their gains at any cost.

While news agencies discuss clean-up efforts and the string of unsuccessful attempts to plug the leak, the plight oil coated wildlife and the local population who are suffering unemployment and the loss of their businesses is ignored.  While the BP, Transocean and Halliburton executives worry about bad public relations and their bonuses, the coastal inhabitants worry about defaulting on their mortgages, loosing their homes and their futures.  While BP has promised to help these people, the $5,000 payouts already made are likely exhausted by the average person and certainly by businesses.   Without immediate assistance, they face bankruptcies and foreclosures and from the experience of those who suffered from spills caused by Katrina, any further assistance will probably not come without years of litigation.

The prognosis for the local ecosystem is even more grim.  Oil from the Exxon-Valdez disaster is still making appearances in Alaska, and that spill was not as massive as this one.  This spill is likely to reach up the Eastern seaboard of the United States and large underwater plumes of oil have been seen working their way across the Atlantic, effecting anything their path.  And what of effects of those dispersants that were likely even more toxic than the oil they were meant to eliminate and was known to be killing algae, one of the fundamental and most important elements in the ecosystem?

More attention needs to be paid to the real costs of this disaster instead of the political and corporate spins provided by the elites that each own a part of the blame in this.  Maybe if we look to the devastation wrought by the greed of a few, there will be enough real outrage to make the companies involved live up to their ethical and moral obligations to compensate the victims and make some real effort to clean up the spill and repair the environmental damage.  Beyond this, it might help push some real reform in the system, like cutting the ties between big money and big government so that the corporate greed machine has less effect on public policies and outcomes, and creating a real system of the people.


In the meantime, have a look at the pictures on Think Progress, they are a good start in making people see a small part of the environmental cost.

Think Progress » The pictures BP doesn’t want you to see.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Partial, temporary, fragile containment (washingtonmonthly.com)
• The BP Oil Spill and the Need for a Risk Dispersant (blogs.hbr.org)
• 1979 Gulf Oil Blowout Shows Us Progress Will Be Measured In Years, Not Weeks (crooksandliars.com)
• In BP Speak: BP is 'helping' with the 'Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill' (trueslant.com)
• BP investors struggle to factor in huge costs (msnbc.msn.com)
• Obama's oil spill point man: Gulf held hostage (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• BP Will Likely Survive Spill, but Worth Much Less (abcnews.go.com)
• Liz Cheney Sticks Up For Halliburton, Insists It Had No Role In Oil Spill: 'I Don't Know What Planet You Live On' (thinkprogress.org)
• Day 45 and Counting (timesunion.com)
• Terribly ugly image of crude oil soaked bird in Gulf of Mexico (robertg69.wordpress.com)
• BP Chief Won't Quit Over Gulf of Mexico Spill (abcnews.go.com)
• Officials tiptoe on message of oil spill progress (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• BP chief won't quit over Gulf of Mexico spill (sfgate.com)